If you think my last post was too close to spoiling the movie, you really won't want to read this:
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050515/REVIEWS/50503002
What I can't understand is how Roger Ebert could give Revenge of the Sith 3.5 stars. I read through his review, and he doesn't really have much of anything good to say. "Weak dialogue, love story worse than Hallmark cards, flat acting, graphics not really used to their best effect, oh, what a great movie!" It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment